Parnalia Equities

Strategy

Investment Strategy

Parnalia Equities is a long-only public-equities strategy built on a simple philosophy: process over prediction. Three decisions govern everything — what to own, how much to own, and when to sell.

Rules narrow the field of potential investments. Fundamental analysis helps evaluate the businesses that remain. Position size is set by a fixed-risk framework, while a predefined long-term rule determines when a position is sold.

This is an engineering mindset applied to investing, not a claim that markets reduce to a formula. Judgment keeps the questions it answers best — competitive position, management quality, industry economics, long-term opportunity. The questions most exposed to emotion are answered by rules written in advance: Does the security qualify? How much capital is initially at risk? What condition ends the position? Encoding those decisions makes the process something that can be examined, measured and improved, rather than reconstructed after every outcome.

The four principles below put that philosophy into practice.

01

Rules end the trade

Selection and exit are treated differently from business analysis because they solve different problems.

Technical trend criteria provide the primary screen for new positions. Fundamental research then helps evaluate the business behind the signal — its economics, durability, capital allocation, competitive position and potential to compound.

Once a position is opened, however, the exit is not continually renegotiated. A predefined long-term trend rule determines when the position is sold. The purpose is deliberate: avoid turning every drawdown, headline, valuation concern or market prediction into a new decision.

The rule will never produce the perfect exit. That is not its job. Its job is to make the process repeatable.

02

Concentration is earned

Every new position enters under the same risk framework. Initial size is capped near 3.5% of portfolio value, with roughly 1% of capital at risk based on the predefined exit level. Leverage is targeted at no more than 1.20×.

The strategy does not progressively add to winning positions or trim them simply because they have become large.

That creates an important distinction between starting concentration and earned concentration.

A position may eventually represent a much larger share of the portfolio because the investment appreciated substantially. In that situation, concentration is the consequence of a successful investment rather than an unusually large initial bet.

This also means accepting that a winner can retreat materially before the exit rule is reached. The alternative — continually deciding when enough profit is enough — introduces a new discretionary decision precisely when emotion is strongest.

03

Liquidity keeps the rules honest

A risk rule has little value if the assumed exit cannot realistically be executed.

For that reason, the investable universe emphasizes liquid, scalable securities. The strategy primarily operates in established public companies where normal trading volume provides reasonable confidence that positions can be entered and exited without the trade itself becoming the dominant source of risk.

Liquidity becomes especially important when positions appreciate into larger portfolio weights.

Volatility is expected. Inability to exit is a different problem.

The portfolio can tolerate substantial mark-to-market movement when the underlying position remains liquid and the exit framework remains executable.

04

Quality is never a substitute for risk management

A strong business can still be a poor investment.

The strategy therefore does not allow a judgment such as "high quality" to override position sizing, liquidity requirements or the exit framework.

Business quality matters because it affects what may be worth owning and holding. It does not create permission to ignore risk.

That distinction becomes most important when a thesis appears compelling. Conviction can improve decision-making when it is grounded in evidence, but it can also become a reason to rationalize deteriorating conditions.

The process is designed so that no company becomes exempt from the rules simply because the story is persuasive.

See the public track record